And referees were still left to judge whether or not a quarterback made an 'intentional' forward movement with their arm. [8], This was not the first time the Patriots had seen the tuck rule invoked in the 2001 NFL season. It would be the same as saying when a QB is handing off to a RB and the ball comes out, the QB is technically passing the ball to the RB so it should be an incomplete pass, also. Anything else? No such rule ever existed. The Tuck rule should have never came into play. Bad rule. The rule means that a potentially key fumble could now be deemed an incomplete pass. Brady played in the 2000 Thanksgiving game @ Detroit, so this wasn't his first game. The rule was properly applied, period. Jan. 19, 2002 is a date that will always live in infamy for Raiders coach Jon Gruden. How about this rule. I have done this and Woodson blitzed off the corner, forced a fumble and greg beikert recovered it winning the game for the Raiders. The tuck rule was called in Week 2 of an NFL regular season matchup on September 23, 2001, between the New England Patriots and the New York Jets. It's been 10 years since the infamous tuck rule game, and the rule itself reared its ugly . After a video-replay review, referee Walt Coleman reversed the call, declaring the play an incomplete forward-pass and giving possession back to New England. Yeah, this is the problem. To say that the Raiders simply were beaten by the Patriots is one of the stupidest things I have ever read. sick and tired of Pereira, self-promoting pompous a$$, he would support such a change who cares. Think Pereiras pension and/or benefits from his former employer may be lost in the mail? The "Tuck Rule Game." It's a memory Raider Nation knows all too well. You can't see the line of scrimmage on the field. Teams that were the victims of blown calls in big games? [1] The Broncos eventually went on to win the game. I think that the play 10 years ago should have been a fumble. Plain and simple. And even if they got there, the high-powered Rams awaited. Well, folks, The Bussy Contingency has been activated. A timeline of Patriots scandals: Spygate, Deflategate and other It's time to get rid of it. QB is trying to throw a screen pass, gets bumped, running back drops screen passfumble. If the decision had remained a fumble, it would have almost certainly sealed the game for Oakland. He's already completed his "pump" the ball has come back and touched his other hand. According to the rule, he insists the call was made correctly and reiterated those feelings. If you watch the replay of Cassels arm (or Bradys for that matter) you can clearly see that his arm is moving forward when he loses possession. Well it's not a rule any more so problem solved. What is the 'tuck rule' in NFL and why is it controversial? That Tuck Rule loss to the Patriots may have paralyzed your franchise. It was 20 years ago today, when the Patriots played the Raiders, in a snow bowl matchup often referred to as as 'The Tuck Rule Game." The resulting win, leading to an incredible run of postseason victories and Super Bowls for former Patriots quarterback Tom Brady and the Patriots. In fact it is typically encountered about once a year by each team in the league. I love how people act like the Pats won against the Raiders only because of the tuck rule. Tom Brady, Jon Gruden and the 'Tuck Rule' come full circle in - NFL Most Patriots fans will even admit they were given a gift on that play. 6-keys: media/spln/nfl/reg/free/stories, By pressing sign up, I confirm that I have read and agree to the. Brought into the game in 1999, the 'tuck rule' was controversial from the very beginning. If the player loses possession of the ball during an attempt to bring it back toward his body, or if the player loses possession after he has tucked the ball into his body, it is a fumble. . Why? After NFL owners voted 29-1 to repeal the controversial Tuck Rule at the annual meeting in Phoenix on Wednesday, it is no longer in effect. Tucker Carlson: Merrick Garland Is Persecuting Christians; Are You Im sure its no consolation to the many Raiders fans around the country.. - So please, for the love of god, SHUT THE HELL UP!!!!! how many times has the tuck rule been called - kazuyasu.net Bradys was a fumble. So in your opinion that 2nd down and 10 really sealed the game for the Pats even though it didnt create a score, and the Pats still trailed at that point in the game. Brown fumbled the ball at the end of the return, but Pats linebacker Larry Izzo recovered it with 2:06 left on the clock. Buy Raiders Tickets. Tuck Rule documentary: Raiders' Woodson, Patriots' Tom Brady relive it section: | slug: tom-brady-admits-controversial-tuck-rule-game-play-might-have-been-a-fumble-and-not-an-incomplete-pass | sport: football | route: article_single.us | I am writing because harrisonhits2 has pissed me off with his idiotic post above. Were things run differently back then? I said might. Brady was patting the ball. I have a very simple solution to this absurd rule: When the defender hits the QB, if the ball hits the ground behind the line of scrimmage it's a fumble. IMO -if the QB is so pressured by the defense that the ball comes loose,if forward motion doesnt carry the ball past the line of scrimmage (or to the feet of an eligible receiver in the backfield) then it should be a fumble. Pereira sucks everytime he says how a challenge will go the ref comes out and does something completely different I dont care for that guy, WELL SAID theandy59 Im age 52 and watched that game myself Then the refs had the gall to add two unsportsman penalties, putting the ball on the five yard line, when in fact the game should have been over. If the ball lands in front of the QB, its an incomplete pass. Whine about 1976 all you want Patriot fans. Your explanations for years were at best inconsistent. It was a snowy day at Foxboro Stadium. By Pereiras estimate, its been called 120-150 times since it was called in the Raiders-Patriots playoff game (see 2005 story linked in my earlier post) and many times before then, so every team has experienced it MULTIPLE TIMES, though admittedly with lesser importance than that famous instance. NFL -- Ten years later, 'Tuck Rule Game' still resonates - ESPN.com Tuck rule or not the raiders got robbed. And it's most famous use came in the 2001 AFC Divisional showdown between the Raiders and the Patriots. How is the ref supposed to determine the exact moment when an arm moving forward transitions from a throwing motion to a tucking motion? Mike Pereira will never admit fault with regards to the rules or officials in public. Very easy to determine what the Qbs intent was and what happened with instant replay. As a Raider fan, I have a different take on the matter. I love how people give the raiders so much attention. Wow! It was a call that was made exactly in the context of the rule, an admittedly bad rule which the competition committee has never thought wise to change. Some members of the plant subfamily Scilloideae are known as hyacinths, but they are not edible and, Copyright 2023 TipsFolder.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme. No choice but to respect the officials probably correct decision. They had already lost in the playoffs and Mike Pereira and his crew of crooked and biased referees can go straight to hell for their ignorance! As a Patriots fan, I always thought it was a bad rule and wished it were changed, but I also want the refs to follow the rules rather than making stuff up to call. This solution also solves intentional grounding. So the rule was fine for 10 years but now you see the wrong it it???? If it is taken out, you have to decide when the forward arm motion stops being a pass and starts to become fumble territory. NFL Rule 3, Section 22, Article 2, and Note 2 were stated. if i was a raiders fan my bedroom would look like finkels and my mother certainly wouldnt be giving out cookies at the door. Only one of the Patriots 12 balls was underinflated by two pounds, according to the report. Such a tough call. Is Tom Brady the same great quarterback without that first Super Bowl win? I dont even think Cassel was tucking the ball. at Foxboro Stadium, Foxborough, Massachusetts. 6 Marine Corps 'Rules' That Are Not Actually Regulations It was 10 years ago. The NFL championship was the first in the club's history and began a period of dominance for the Patriots in the 2000s and 2010s that included eight additional Super Bowl appearances with five more titles, in Super Bowls XXXVIII, XXXIX, XLIX, LI, and LIII. The 2001 AFC Divisional Playoff game between the New England Patriots and the Oakland Raiders, also known as the Tuck Rule Game or the Snow Bowl,[2][3] or sometimes referred to as Snow Bowl 2, took place on January 19, 2002, at Foxboro Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, which was at the time the Patriot's home stadium. how many times has the tuck rule been called The tuck rule was enforced in a regular season game on October 9, 2005, between the Washington Redskins and the Denver Broncos. Fidelity Ria Minimum AumFidelity sets a platform minimum of $30 million That should have been a roughing the passer call with 15 yards and a first down instead of just a second down. First, the Tuck Rule was not only a bad rule, but it wasn't applicable on the basis of overwhelming evidence and the Raiders got screwed. Yes, keep the rule until each team has experienced it at least once. Afterwards, referring obliquely to the 2002 Tuck Rule Game, Patriots owner Robert Kraft said, "I love the tuck rule, and forever will, and I know [longtime Raiders owner] Al Davis, may he rest in peace, is probably smiling. Tom Brady finally admits Tuck Rule play 'might have been a fumble' Dont let revisionist history fool you: This wasnt some great Oakland team that was destined to win it all. 2013,What exactly does the tuck rule mean? Incomplete pass? I dont give a damn if you, the rule book, Mike Pereira, Roger Godell, The Fonz, the Waterboy, Radio, or every cafeteria lady in America says that it was an incomplete pass.the replay clearly shows it was a fumble! Because the play was initially ruled a fumble, instant-replay rules required the referee to see "incontrovertible visual evidence" on the replay that Brady had not "tucked the ball into his body and then {lost} possession" of it before reversing the original call on the field. Well guess what, the raiders won the game when Woodson forced the fumble and Beikert fell on it. thats why we have instant replay now. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/14/AR2005101401828_2.html. Photos (and replay) clearly show Brady with both hands on the ball before its knocked out. I am truly staggered by the impeccable logic and flawless analytical acumen demonstrated by your post. And since he'll retire after calling half the Pro Bowl later this month, he'll never get the chance. Bill Polian (Colts) is the chairman. As for the Raiders, who are still salty about the call all these years later, their season would have been extended by about one week. After the officials reviewed the play, it was determined Brady was in a throwing motion and was attempting to "tuck" the ball towards his body, therefore making it an incomplete pass and resulting in the Patriots keeping the ball. THE 'tuck rule' in the NFL is regarded as one of the most controversial in sports history. Many feel it was a controversial play that allowed New England to move on, win their first Super Bowl and set the tone for all that have accomplished since. Should it be changed?surebut that wont reverse history. No choice but to respect the officials probably correct decision. The ball should not have to be loose in the act of passing for it to be ruled incomplete. Later in the quarter, Patriots receiver Troy Brown returned Shane Lechler's 37-yard punt 27 yards to the Patriots 46-yard line. It was incorrectly applied in the Raiders/Pats game. "The Tuck Rule" changed Tom Brady's career. So if they rule its not a fumble then it should be ruled intentional grounding, with loss of that down, and ball placed at the spot of where the ball hits the ground. But now Pereira says the rule needs to be scrapped. The call was overturned upon review and ruled an incomplete pass, with the tuck rule cited. Then, after a 33-yard punt by Walter gave the Raiders a first down on their own 49, a 22-yard reception by receiver Jerry Rice set up Janikowski's second field goal, from 45 yards, giving the Raiders a 133 lead with two minutes left in the third quarter. worst call in history of sports. "Katniss, the girl who was on fire.", When I was younger, I scared my mother to death, the things I would blurt out about District 12, about the people who rule our country, Panem, from the far . What about Bill Belichick? It was a pump fake that he brought back to his body. In this case, they clearly took a victory away from the Raiders. [9] On September 23, Patriots defensive end Anthony Pleasant apparently forced Jets quarterback Vinny Testaverde to fumble,[10] but the call was overturned upon review and ruled an incomplete pass. [17], Up to his retirement at the end of the 2018 season, Coleman officiated 265 more NFL games, including 21 more involving the Patriots, but none involving the Raiders. It stated: NFL Rule 3, Section 22, Article 2, Note 2. Walt Coleman didn't officiate a Raiders game after 'tuck rule' call Im sure its no consolation to the many Raiders fans around the country.. Watch the replay!He never threw the ball. Let's look at some more examples of Tuck Rule-type plays from last season with a prediction of how they will be called in 2013. While it appeared that Brady had tucked the ball back towards his body, the officials were not sure and ruled it a fumble so they could review the play. Now if you could just pick up a first down on 3rd and 1, the Pats never get it back in the first place. Brady then completed a seven-yard pass to Kevin Faulk before scrambling for five yards and running out of bounds to the Patriots' sideline, picking up a first down at the Oakland 42. Correct call. In the closing moments of the fourth quarter and with the Pats trailing by three, Brady received the snap and stepped back into the pocket to pass. While I'm not arguing with you, but I know the general thing now is that if there's not enough evidence but only a sliver of evidence to overturn it, they won't. If a QB stops his throwing motion and starts to protect the ball. WELL SAID theandy59 Im age 52 and watched that game myself Then the refs had the gall to add two unsportsman penalties, putting the ball on the five yard line, when in fact the game should have been over. May 5, 2022 2:22pm. Thats what happened. The pain can still be felt. end of story. harrisonhits2 says: Jan 11, 2011 12:11 PM. But..the reversal was the correct call at the time, because thats the way the rule was written then, and thats the way the rule still reads today. How about this for a rule: you lose the ball it is a fumble. The Jets tied the game with a field goal on that drive before going on to win 103. Get over it, pathetic Raiders fans. Everybody Knows Pats ring dont mean nothing. He is a PR machine for the NFL and nothing more. The call was overturned upon review and ruled an incomplete pass, with the tuck rule cited.