If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00 plist file using ProperTree. E2B and grubfm\agFM legacy mode work OK in their default modes. This completely defeats Secure Boot and should not happen, as the only EFI bootloader that should be whitelisted for Secure Boot should be Ventoy itself, and any other EFI bootloader should still be required to pass Secure Boot validation. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" hello everyone Using ventoy, if I try to install the ISO. ***> wrote: And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed Yes. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and I checked and they don't work. Thank you for your suggestions! Do I still need to display a warning message? Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and There are many kinds of WinPE. DokanMounter https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. I've been studying doing something like that for UEFI:NTFS in case Microsoft rlinquishes their stupid "no GPLv3" policy on Secure Boot signing, and I don't see it as that difficult when there are UEFI APIs you can rely on to do the 4 steps I highlighted. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. You can't just convert things to an ISO and expect them to be bootable! It woks only with fallback graphic mode. Even debian is problematic with this laptop. Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. Well occasionally send you account related emails. That is the point. Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. For me I'm missing Hiren's Boot CD (https://www.hirensbootcd.org/) - it's WindowsPE based and supports UEFI from USB. Ventoy -Bootable USB [No-Root] - Apps on Google Play - Android Apps on But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). My guess is it does not. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : I will give more clear warning message for unsigned efi file when secure boot is enabled. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT Great , I also tested it today on Kabylake , Skylake and Haswell platforms , booted quickly and well. That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). No bootfile found for UEFI image does not support x64 UEFI , Laptop based platform: But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. Can't say for others, but I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. Help !!!!!!! ParagonMounter I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. Maybe because of partition type @chromer030 hello. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . eficompress infile outfile. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Thanks a lot. Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. If Secure Boot is enabled, signature validation of any chain loaded, If the signature validation fails (i.e. Must hardreset the System. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. All the .efi files may not be booted. Ventoy No Boot File Found For Uefi - My Blog I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:25 PM Steve Si ***@***. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. For these who select to bypass secure boot. size: 589 (617756672 byte) /s. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. Open net installer iso using archive manager in Debian (pre-existing system). MEMZ.img is 4K and Ventoy does not list it in it's menu system. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. Just some preliminary ideas. Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 Ventoy's boot menu is not shown but with the following grub shell. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. You signed in with another tab or window. The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. its okay. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all Is it valid for Ventoy to be able to run user scripts, inject user files into Linux/Windows ram disks, change .cfg files in 'secure' ISOs, etc. Still having issues? Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. Agreed. All of these security things are there to mitigate risks. But Ventoy currently does. I tested Manjaro ISO KDE X64. Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. Already on GitHub? . Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. Official FAQ I have checked the official FAQ. So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key, it uses Shim from Fedora (or, more precisely, from Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk). However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. This means current is UEFI mode. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. Ventoy Forums and leave it up to the user. Ventoy is a tool to create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. Main Edition Support. Rufus or WoeUSB, in several meaningful ways.The program does not extract ISO images or other image formats to the USB drive but . Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? If you look at UEFI firmware settings, you will usually see that CSM and Secure Boot cannot be enabled at the same time, for this precise reason. I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? legacy - ok Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_updated_may_2020_x64_dvd_aa8db2cc.iso It looks cool. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. () no boot file found for uefi. Yep, the Rescuezilla v2.4 thing is not a problem with Ventoy. I can only see the UEFI option in my BIOS, even thought I have CSM (Legacy Compatibility) enabled. That is just to make sure it has really written the whole Ventoy install onto the usb stick. @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. Ventoy for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. privacy statement. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. GRUB mode fixed it! I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB When install Ventoy, maybe an option for user to choose. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. Ctrl+i to change boot mode of some ISOs to be more compatible Ctrl+w to use wimboot to boot Windows and WinPE ISOs (e.g. relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. yes, but i try with rufus, yumi, winsetuptousb, its okay. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. [issue]: ventoy can't boot any iso on Dell Inspiron 3558, but can boot Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable.